The first human parechoviruses (HPeVs) were initially called Human echovirus 22 (HPeV-1) and Human echovirus 23 (HPeV-2).[11,12] These guys were discovered in the summer of 1956, but they weren’t officially renamed and put into their own genus until 1996.[1]

This very month the genus was officially split into two species, Parechovirus A (containing the 16 human parechoviruses) and Parechovirus B (containing 4 Ljungan viruses).[2,3]

HPeVs are usually summertime viruses, and they are not that unusual, although there is still plenty to learn about them. They usually show up or make the news, when more severe infections drive small children to the hospital with central nervous system disturbances.[6,7] It has been assumed that they’re spread by contact and also by droplets via the respiratory tract and the faecal-oral route. HPeVs can be detected in the nasopharynx, throat, blood as well as cerebrospinal fluid and faeces – usually using RT-PCR technologies.[8]

After a study last year of families in Japan, genetically identical HPeV variants could be identified among both sick and well members.[4] They speculated that asymptomatic HPeV infections might be a source of the spread of infectious HPeV to others in such a close-quartered environment. 

While HPeVs were sometimes found in the absence of any signs of illness in this study, some family members showed the more serious end of an HPeV infection – encephalitis, septic shock as well as fever, vomiting and diarrhoea.[4]

There are no specific antiviral drugs available to treat HPeV, and no vaccine exists. Supportive treatment is recommended for serious illnesses, and most, although not all, serious cases reportedly recover without any later problems, although long-term studies are needed.[9,10,8] The best prevention is consistent hand hygiene after nose wiping, going to the toilet or changing nappies and coughing and sneezing into a tissue which is then discarded.[5]

Once again, we see that a virus found in patients with severe disease can also be found in a person without any disease. The outcome of virus infection is best considered as sitting somewhere along a sliding scale and which will vary from animal to animal. Just don’t lump the outcome into any one particular box.

References…

1. http://www.picornastudygroup.com/taxa/genera.htm
2. http://www.picornastudygroup.com/taxa/species/species.htm
3. http://www.ictvonline.org/proposals/2014.016aV.A.v1.Picornaviridae_spren.pdf
4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26305831
5. http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/factsheets/Pages/parechovirus.aspx
6. http://virologydownunder.blogspot.com.au/2013/12/what-to-watch-for-with-human.html
7. http://virologydownunder.blogspot.com.au/2013/11/parechovirus-infections-in-babies-in.html
8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21736976
9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25301212
10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23810613
11. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13785166
12. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13538681

Updates…

1. 17FEB2016 – Added 2 references
2. 10AUG2016 – Note that one Echovirus 23 (CT86-6760) is not an HPeV-2, but a misclassified HPeV-5 – Al-Sunaidi et al. J Virol 81;2. 1013-1021
3. 17JUL2022 – Moved from

Views: 284