Another canary in the same coalmine – mild MERS may be bad news…

Sometimes, the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is detected in a person who is not ill. 

Weird huh? 

Not really. This is the result of laboratory testing of contacts of a known and infected person during the process of containing a potential outbreak. For me personally, this is one big question about new or emerging viral infections or infections we are still learning about – like new influenza viruses, MERS-CoV, ebolaviruses and Zika virus. Do we really know how often a laboratory-confirmed infected person with mild or no illness can spread the virus to a new person, an uninfected potential host? Are our tools up to the job of detecting what’s happening, and are we using them properly? Conventional wisdom holds that truly asymptomatic but virus-infected people do not infect others around them, or, if they do, it’s a rare event. Because the risk is seen as low, studies on this issue are often low on the list of research priorities.

The importance of this issue lies in whether mild or asymptomatic people should be considered more closely as potential contributors to community or hospital outbreaks.

Emerging from the 2015 South Korean MERS-CoV outbreak, a recent report described the findings from laboratory testing of 82 contacts of an asymptomatic healthcare worker.[1] No other person became MERS-CoV positive. I have some issues with the fact that the nurse herself hasn’t been tested to show that she developed antibodies to MERS-CoV, and there isn’t much discussion about how PCR testing for MERS-CoV can be a bit “flaky” when sampling from the upper respiratory tract once. Although there aren’t any sampling details in this paper either (I’ll blog about this paper another day)!

But I digress. 

I’ve plotted all publicly available mentions of asymptomatic MERS-CoV infections by week in the graph below (the bottom panel). 

Click on the image to enlarge.

The yellow peaks show that cases without illness usually correlate with healthcare workers in the graph above, during hospital and healthcare facility outbreaks (see my previous post describing the pink graph in the top panel).[2] 

This isn’t too surprising. The majority of disease associated with MERS-CoV infection arises in older males who already have an underlying disease including diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis and various lung, renal and cardiac conditions. Healthcare workers, however, are usually younger and do not have, or have not yet developed, such comorbidities. 

MERS-CoV is often shown to be a bit of a bully when challenged by a healthy younger host’s immune system. Although when hit with a larger primary dose of virus from an infected camel, even the healthy can get hit very hard.

Healthcare workers can be the ‘canary in the coalmine’, except singing about a healthcare outbreak rather than a gas leak. Similarly, laboratory-confirmed MERS-CoV infection manifesting with only mild or no signs and symptoms of disease also serves as a sentinel for hospital rather than camel-to-human transmission of MERS-CoV.

References…

  1. Infectivity of an Asymptomatic Patient With Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection.
  2. Working for health can make you sick…

Discover more from Virology Down Under

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.